Things I believe #1: Auto-pilot, I’m not alone, sociology and brackets

I believe that the state I’ve termed ‘auto-pilot’ is common and okay. Eat a meal without any presence. Go to work for eight hours, come home a few moments later. Partake in a long and witty conversation without a single thought. Have a night out with friends and miss it. Max Weber called this state the ‘inarticulate half-consciousness’ – I think it is very human, and thus very social. He described it like this (Economy and Society, 21-2):

Max Weber: I know that face

Max Weber: I know that face

‘In the great majority of cases actual action goes on in a state of inarticulate half-consciousness or actual unconsciousness of its subjective meaning. The actor is more likely to “be aware” of it in a vague sense than he is to “know” what he is doing or be explicitly conscious about it. In most cases his action is governed by impulse or habit. Only occasionally and in the uniform action of large numbers . . . is the subjective meaning of the action, whether rational or irrational, brought clearly into consciousness. The ideal type of meaningful action where the meaning is fully conscious and explicit is a marginal case.’

This is why story telling can be a beautiful constant if you’re with a partner that insists on constantly knowing your thoughts (if you don’t tell a story, they’ll likely tell themselves one). It’s also why you should never completely believe that intentions can be ‘deciphered’ through actions. More specifically, it’s why sociology can never truly do what so many undergrads, laymen and chatterers think it can: provide us with a grand method for analysing (and *gasp* accurately and consistently predicting) social action in all its forms (still… we do what we can).

Now, let’s deal with a criticism some readers (in my mind at least) will probably make:

‘But Christian, the phrase “half-consciousness” implicitly suggests that there is such a thing as a “whole-consciousness”. I’m reading what you’re not saying, and that seems like a positivist claim if ever there was one – and, as everyone knows, positivism is derp.’

First of all, dear reader, that’s a mighty sharp brain you have there. This is why I coined the less positivist term ‘auto-pilot’ (because it’s all in the language, right?). But even if I didn’t, it can be wasteful to throw out ideas simply because they come packaged in a disagreeable argument. Passing statements like “I don’t agree with X”, or “Such and such thinker is an idiot” often take what could be any number of insights or observations and pin them to a single object – be it a school, discipline, or human body – which can then easily be rejected. While this can be useful as conversational shorthand, it can develop into a habit that stunts intellectual development. Besides, even if it is a positivist claim, does that mean you can’t relate at all to the state I’m talking about?

At any rate, I know that this state is certainly a real thing for me, in that it is a corner in the court of my lived experience. The fact that Weber, a German from way back, possibly thought along the same lines makes me think that I am not alone in this (thank goodness for books saying what friends and family won’t!). Is it just Weber and I, or have you been there (kind of) too?

Sociyolo.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Things I believe #1: Auto-pilot, I’m not alone, sociology and brackets

  1. “Inarticulate half-consciousness.” I love this phrase, it actually sounds humorous because it is so true. Like you agree, I would say this is merely a trait of all humans- we are creatures of habit, routine, and laziness. I believe the human brain, especially in todays developed countries, is almost forced to become lazy and inactive. Humans will only do as much as they need to for survival, and it modern times one needs to virtually do nothing out of the ordinary or that requires too much mental effort to do so.

    Neuroscientist Joe Dispenza talks about this term (though he does not use that sociological phrase) in great detail in his book, “Evolve Your Brain.” Inarticulate half-consciousness, I would say, is purely inactivation of our (uniquely) human part of the brain called the pre-frontal lobe/pre-frontal cortex, which feels like experiencing large frequencies of ‘brain fog.’

    A simple solution; one can engage in a brand new activity or experience, developing new neural pathways inside the brain to experience a feeling of pure presence or “flow.” Either that or become intermediate in mindfulness or meditative exercises.

    Great post, I enjoyed reading it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s